Questionnaire for 2G1121 Logikprogrammering Fall-2004

Please answer as many questions as possible and return via e-mail (anonymously if you wish,
I promise not to use the address) to sjoland@imit.kth.se.
Thanks in advance for your participation!

If you want to be really sure of your anonymity then print the form,
fill in the answers by hand possibly with extra sheets) and send it to:

Thomas Sjöland
KTH Mikroelektronik och Informationsteknologi - IMIT (LECS)
Electrum 229
164 40 Kista

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For questions 1-6 ("standard"-questions) the following six alterantives could be used

unless indicated otherwise :

1 Very bad

2 Bad

3 Rather bad

4 Rather good

5 Good

6 Very good

"Standard"-questions:

1. Overview questions

a. How well did the course goals show at the beginning of the course?

b. Did you miss a special course-PM (in addition to the www-info)?

c. How has the information been during the course?

d. How was the availability of the course material?

e. What do you think about the course literature?

f. What do you think about the exercises?

2. Lectures

a. What percentage of the lectures/tutorials did you participate in?

(100, 80, 60, 40, 20, 0)

b. How was the lecturer pedagogically speaking?

c. What use did you have of the lectures/tutorials?

d. Did the lecturer use available tools appropriately (OH, video, etc)?

3. Exercises, 4. Laborations

<not included since these parts are not explicit in the course. See below on project task.>

5. What do you think about the environment in

a. The lecture rooms concerning light, acoustics and air?

(b, c is about exercise and labrooms)

6. Other questions

a. How well did the examination cover the course content?

b. How good were your previous knowledge for this course?

c. How well were the requirements of prior knowledge fitting the course?

d. How meaningful did you consider this course?

Special questions for this course:

Your background:

7. What is your study "line"? Which year?

Literature (and related):

8. Do you miss something in the course literature? Do you think anything could be excluded?

9. Did you use the web-information?

If yes, do you think the web-information was good?

Do you miss something in it? Do you think something could be removed?

The examination

10. Do you think it is a good idea that you can bring literature on the examination, or would you prefer an examination without course literature?

11. Would you consider any other type of examination on this course, and if so, what?

About the relation to other courses:

12. Did you find a troubling overlap between certain parts of this course and other courses, and if so, which parts? Or was there rather an "underlap" (some missing links)?

13. Can you see possibilities to relate the course and its contents to other courses at KTH more than was already done? Any concrete suggestions?

14. Would it be beneficial for you to have taken some parts of this course earlier in your education, and if so, which parts? Do you think it would be sensible to make the whole course or some parts a mandatory part of the education programme?